CONSULTATION STARTS HERE - THE REPORT, THE RESULTS
CHAPTER 10 - CONCLUSIONS
10.1 As the title of this
report implies, this consultation represents the first step
in public consultation over the regeneration of this great
Park. It is in fact the first time in 150 years that the
public has been openly consulted over its future. 10.2 In all areas apart from
the Top Site, the results are clear and predictable. The
public clearly believes that the Main Park should continue
to be used as a landscaped park. The Sports Centre should
continue to be used as a Sports Centre, and the Museum Area
as a museum. Compatible ancillary uses are also widely
supported. 10.3 In relation to the Top
Site, the results are slightly more complex. There is an
overwhelming belief that the Top Site should be used as
managed parkland and/or an ecology park. However, neither of
these uses is necessarily incompatible with other uses.
There is strong support for the history of the Palace to be
reinforced through exposition and/or monuments. There is
also majority support for outdoor arts there. 10.4 The notion of a building
on the Top Site is supported by nearly as many people as
those who oppose it, with the most popular options amongst
supporters being for arts/cultural buildings and community
buildings. The commercial/leisure centre option for the Top
Site is clearly rejected. 10.5 We hope that these results
will enable the debate to be moved forward. 10.6 It will be necessary to
start exploring the views of the public in a little more
detail, and in a more specific way. For example, the
questionnaire responses may demonstrate tentative support
for some form of arts/cultural building in a landscaped
setting on the Top Site. But whether that would prove more
popular than no building at all can only be explored in the
context of more specific proposals. While a local community
arts facility in extensive grounds might attract support, a
new Festival Hall in a small garden might not, and vice
versa. 10.7 The methods for community
consultation have moved forwards in recent years, and best
practice is emerging through the involvement of park
consultants, environmental trusts and umbrella groups such
as the Urban Parks Forum. It is now common to find weekend
workshops at which communities work on park master plans
together with consultants, or "inquiries by design" meetings
in which local people have the opportunity to work with
architects on the fine tuning of proposals. It is only
through a patient, iterative process that a community can
get the park that it wants. While this is sometimes
time-consuming and laborious, it is ultimately worthwhile.
In a case as complex and significant as Crystal Palace Park,
it is imperative. 10.8 The Crystal Palace
Campaign would be willing to carry out the next stage of the
consultation process. However, we believe that the best hope
for Crystal Palace Park is a partnership between all
stakeholders through the medium of a community Trust. We
should therefore like the Trust to take forward the process
of democratic consultation. We hope that this report will
lay the foundation for further consultation, and a Park
which we will be proud to leave to our children.
Top
of page
Report
Contents
Go
to Chapter 9 - The Sports Centre
(previous page)
Go
to Appendices and Tables
(next page, List)
Crystal Palace Campaign March 2002 - Consultation Starts Here
Copyright: Day, Kolvin, Sacks 2002
Last updated: 26 March 2002